Yuh-Ruey Chen wrote: > Eric Suen wrote: >> Your proposal make nosense to me, first, I not sure what is your >> strict mode means, because in strict mode there is no automatic >> semicolon insertion.
No, semicolon insertion occurs also in strict mode. Perhaps it shouldn't. >> in must examples you give there is no automatic semicolon insertion, >> your proposal make thing even worse, these are just different coding >> style, for examples, for long expression, it could be: [...] >> if this will cause syntax error, I think no one will use JavaScript... > > Yes, it will make currently valid coding styles invalid, but that's for > the sake of a clean grammar. I modeled my rules off what Ruby allows, > and I haven't really heard Ruby authors complaining about those rules. > If what you said was true, then Ruby would not be growing in popularity, > even if it has a different language genealogy. That's not a valid argument: Ruby had these rules from the start. -- David-Sarah Hopwood _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
