On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Michael Ratcliffe <[email protected]> wrote: > Are there any plans to make onerror part of the ECMA standard and, if so, is > it possible > for me to suggest adding an additional item that should be accessible from > the onerror > handler? I would suggest that a fourth parameter be passed to the onerror > handler, which > is the error object from the time the error is triggered. This would allow > access to the > call stack from within the handler and would be an invaluable in uncovering > complex bugs.
No, window.onerror would be standardized by the W3C or WHATWG, since it's not itself a language feature but rather a part of one embedding context -- albeit a very popular one! Standardizing call stack representation could be in the scope of this group and the ECMA process, if needed. Mike _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
