I was reading through the wiki on the type discussions:
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:types
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=discussion:object_literals_type_of
I realize that some of the content is dated and does not apply to
Harmony in particular, but I'm curious to what the proposal is for
inline types declarations on object literals
This example (from the second url) is straightforward enough:
type Goose = {name: string, email: string, noisy: boolean};
// create a Goose and pass it to f()
f({name: 'Ben', email: '[email protected]', noisy: true} : Goose);
But this example seems a bit lacking:
var white = {r: 0xff, g: 0xff, b: 0xff}; // the type is {*}, not {r:*, g:*,
b:*, *} or anything like that.
Is there a problem with the following syntax or did I overlook some
implication/discussion?
var Point:object = {
color:string
x:double = 20,
y:double = 50,
z:double = 3
}
_______________________________________________
Es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
