On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock < [email protected]> wrote:
> > I'm fine with dropping the Function name property from 3.1 > > I think that might be best, although we would still need to define the > toString name for all possible function creation scenarios. > > +1. When in doubt, leave it out. Nothing else in the spec depends on <function>.name, nor do any of the real goals for ES3.1. -- Cheers, --MarkM
_______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
