On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > No, sorry -- no time. What's your point? If you see something worth
My point? If you had read the source code, then you might have reason for waiting to hear from the objective-j folks to make a decision on [[Writable]] name. What could the reason be? People do all sorts of things with javascript. Whether those things effectively and efficiently solve problems is something that can often be determined by looking at the problem juxtaposed against the source code without too much difficulty (this is depending on the fundamental complexity of the problem). >From the cappucino website:- | Why Objective-J, Cappuccino and SproutCore are completely changing the | web app industry | | ...if you use Cappuccino, those apps will automatically look and | behave like ... desktop apps - with zero learning curve on the | developer's side. He or she can simply focus on building an kick ass | app instead of trying to re-invent basic UI functionality every single | time. http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/msg/6d266c0ddc64f9ec?dmode=source&output=gplain Good stuff. Garrett > describing, please do so. Otherwise: Let's hear from the Obj-J folks anyway, > the source does not speak or think. > > /be > > On Mar 6, 2009, at 9:44 AM, Garrett Smith wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Mar 5, 2009, at 9:26 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> Agree, but let's hear from the Obj-J folks. >>> >> >> Have you looked at the source code? >> >> Garrett > > _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
