Ash Berlin wrote: > On 21 Mar 2009, at 22:16, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > >> i'd be interested to hear how these issues can be addressed, using the >> new language features, so that javascript can become a language that >> can be taken seriously instead of being treated as something that >> people avoid at all costs [silverlight, anyone?] > > Also a lot of your concerns only address javascript as a language > running inside a browser - I for one think it has a future as a stand > alone language.
I don't see that Luke's argument is at all dependent on whether it is an implementation of JS embedded in a browser that is being used as a compilation target. His post has numerous technical errors (which I'll address separately), but this isn't one of them. -- David-Sarah Hopwood ⚥ _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
