On May 4, 2009, at 10:45 AM, P T Withington wrote:
Assuming we're allowed to speculate on futures here...
I was thinking about improving debug-ability by adding descriptive
names to function expressions thusly,
var myFun = function "my description here" (...) { ... };
Is this better for your purposes than
var myFun = function (...) { ... };
myFun.prettyName = "my description here";
/be
I.e., be able to use an arbitrary string as the "name" of a function
expression. It seems to me this would be an unambiguous extension,
only giving up an unlikely syntax error. No runtime is required to
do anything with the name, although it would be encouraged to make
it available as the .name property of the function object. Comments?
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
