The text in 15.3.4.2 Function.prototype.toString () says:

"An implementation-dependent representation of the function is returned. This representation has the syntax of a FunctionDeclaration"

Is there a reason this is a FunctionDeclaration rather than a FunctionExpression? In particular what is the expected behavior for toString of an anonymous function?

var f = function() {}
f.toString()

In the engines I tried this gave a result like

"function () {}"

with only whitespace differences. This doesn't match the FunctionDeclaration production due to the lack of an identifier. Whilst the engine could invent an identifier, I don't see what the advantage would be and I would be worried about breaking existing code by doing so. Instead, I think it would be nice to align the spec with reality here.
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to