On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:23:04 +0200, Oliver Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
Yup. You may also want tests for use of replacer arrays and functions, etc
You meant octal/noctal syntax in replacer arrays and functions? Wasn't quite sure what you were suggesting.
On this topic, i'm fixing an issue in our handling of reviver functions in JSON.parse and noticed that json2.js and the JSON.parse specification differ in the handling of properties being deleted from the holder object, namely if a reviver function deletes a property from holder before it is visited then the current spec behaviour would imply that that property is still visited, only with the value undefined.
Looks like that's the way the spec works, and I've added another edge case test for it here:
http://testsuites.opera.com/JSON/correctness/050.html -- Hallvord R. M. Steen, Core Tester, Opera Software http://www.opera.com http://my.opera.com/hallvors/ _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
