2009/11/2 Brendan Eich <[email protected]>: >Defining accessors on an activation object is nasty, >If you want private getters and setters, you can put them in an object denoted >by a private var: So you prefer ugly solutions, because the others are nasty?
> The upshot for memolus is that with is already a deoptimizer that introduces > non-lexical names onto the scope chain. These can be gettters and setters > and have arbitrary effects. My point remains that adding getters and setters > to activations, which are modeled lexically in the absence of eval, in > strict mode in ES5, and under other such conditions, is a non-starter. I didn't get how to use "with" in order to use private objects (non-lexical names onto the scope chain). Just ignore my example if it tries to add getter and setter to already activated objects. You don't have to implement it this way. _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
