On Jan 9, 2010, at 9:24 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote:
Tom Van Cutsem & I are quite satisfied with the alternate catchall
strawman we have posted as "proxies" at <http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:proxies
>. The current state of this strawman reflects all the input we have
received from discussions on es-discuss. It seems to hold up very
well to all the use-case experiments we have subjected it to (as
gedanken experiments we cannot run yet).
I raised a point about [[Invoke]] not being equivalent to [[Get]] and
then [[Call]] due to order of evaluation:
https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2009-December/010332.html
Did you or Tom have more thoughts on this issue? I couldn't find them
in the wiki page.
I do not mean to monopolize the January meeting. But if no one has
more pressing topics, I suggest all of these would also be good
discussion topics for es-discuss between now and the January
meeting. Especially if anyone has any remaining unaddressed
objections to the weak-pointer or proxies strawmen.
We should definitely spend time on proxies and weak references, but
we'll have modules to cover too, with dherman and samth attending.
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
