On Apr 21, 2010, at 22:49 , Garrett Smith wrote: > Moving this discussion to the (hopefully) non-censored es-discuss.
Hmmm, why? public-script-coord isn't censored, and is an appropriate location for this discussion. Not that I mind where solutions comes from. > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Robin Berjon <[email protected]> wrote: >> the DAP WG has a use case (calendars) in which it is needed for date objects >> to keep their timezone information around, but the ES Date object doesn't. >> We're looking at options to address this issue: >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2010Apr/0051.html > > WebIDL is still going? I thought that had died. Why would it die? It rocks, and it's used extensively. > Regardless, WebIDL defining Date would be inappropriate. A > TimezonedDate extending Date requires a definition of Date. WebIDL is adding a native Date type that would map to ES Date so we wouldn't have to define anything. > | interface TimezonedDate : Date { > | attribute DOMString? tz; > | }; > ^? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
