> In building your semantics, were there parts of the spec that stood > out as under-specified that could benefit from being described via \JS > or desugar?
I don't have a good answer to this question. The paper by Maffeis, Mitchell, and Taly catalogs some of these cases. We had the same problems they did, but didn't think to catalog them since we tried to match implementations, not the specification. Joe Politz is building a semantics for the ES5 spec, so he'll be able to say more about this. Arjun _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
