On Jun 15, 2010, at 9:05 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote: > +1. I find it acceptable to just change this argument to true. The only > objection might be that the resulting thrown error might be surprising to > non-strict code, since all similar errors in non-strict code are silent. But > I am happy not to raise that objection, since I don't particularly care about > that surprise.
It's really unlikely anyway. > I doubt any future spec will introduce any new cases for using Object > Environment Records. Agreed -- if we could salt the earth so nothing more grew there, we would. ES5 strict banning "with" + lexical scope all the way up in simple modules, if not in any <script type="harmony"> (placeholder type there ;-) are a good start. /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
