On Aug 6, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Paul Biggar wrote:

> According to Brendan's reading of the standard, this is allowed,

(Jason Orendorff first noticed this and pointed it out -- I had misread ES5 to 
require a TimeClip for Date.now.)


> partially due to Date.now() being underspecified. The question is
> whether this is a good idea, or if we should shelve it pending the
> nanoAge proposal, ...

The nanoAge proposal is from

http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=proposals:date_and_time&s=nanoage#current_and_elapsed_times

and I believe Paul Biggar and Chris Jones are going to dust this off and make a 
Harmony strawman proposal from it.

/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to