On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Erik Corry <[email protected]> wrote: > And this is as it should be. As it stands the weak map can be used as > an object with private members. The object key acts as a capability > that controls whether or not you have access to the private member.
If I were to be using an object with private members, I would certainly expect that those members would keep their values alive. Wouldn't it be better to just use a regular object, and add private members via defineProperty to make them non-enumerable? I'm not in favour of WeakMap enumerability, really, but it seems that there's an easier way to address this particular use case. Mike _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
