On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:52 PM, David Herman <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> But since Traits seems to be blocked from advancing, >>> >>> Is there someplace I should read to understand why Traits cannot advance? >> >> I asked MarkM off-list what the reason was, and he replied that there >> was an objection (raised by Waldemar?) to how class evolution was >> handled. > > My feeling, and I think the feeling of others at the meeting when we > discussed traits, was that traits.js is a very nice library but that it > doesn't offer enough to the language to warrant standardization, at least > yet. The fact that there would be performance benefits to built-in > implementations of traits isn't enough to make the case. IMO, libraries > should generally be very widely used and very stable before they are added to > the ES standard library.
Does that feeling carry over to any variants that might actually include new syntax? -- Dirk _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
