On Sep 13, 2010, at 2:02 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Dmitry A. Soshnikov > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I didn't finished a detailed reading yet, but from the brief scanning, > syntactically, I think => and trait class are not needed. > > * I used "trait class" rather than "trait" for two reasons: > > 1) Syntactic ambiguity fear. "trait" is not one of the identifiers > reserved by ES5 or ES5/strict, and so I am not proposing that it be an > ES-Harmony keyword. > > 2) More importantly, the object binds to the name it declares is not a > trait but a function for making traits.
I'd prefer 'class trait' which i think reads better, but i'm not sure how much i'm biased due to my desire to retain LL(1)-ness (I know that there is _some_ bias at least) --Oliver
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
