On 2010-12-23 21:02, Brendan Eich wrote: > On Dec 23, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote: > >> You've said this "apples to oranges" thing many times. I just don't get it. > > You've read the recent messages where it became clear only [], not the . > operator, > was ever mooted for soft fields on the wiki.
That's false; the examples at <http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:names_vs_soft_fields> show otherwise. > And how [] can't be a local transformation, [...] Indeed it can't, but I don't see the relevance of that to the '"apples to oranges" thing'. We don't know whether [] will be changed at all. (In the proposal to add a @ or .# operator, it isn't.) -- David-Sarah Hopwood ⚥ http://davidsarah.livejournal.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
