On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:45 PM, David Herman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Should we have a no-op or "sink" standard handler too?
>
> I think so, yes. Especially since you can use that to build one up that
> implements just the other traps you want to implement, and let the others
> "fail soft."
>
How would it be different from
new Proxy.Handler(Object.create(null, {}))
?
Or, depending on how soft you want to fail
new Proxy.Handler(null)
?
If there is a useful difference, I have no objection.
>
> Dave
>
>
--
Cheers,
--MarkM
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
