We avoid freeze-didacticism in general ;-) -- is there a strong reason to freeze in this example?
/be On Jan 26, 2011, at 2:51 PM, David Bruant wrote: > Le 26/01/2011 22:31, Brendan Eich a écrit : >> On Jan 26, 2011, at 11:02 AM, David Bruant wrote: >> >>>> On the question of proxy parameters for all traps (well, receiver for get >>>> and set): fewer args are better, and closure capture of proxy by handler >>>> avoids leaking the proxy to handler friends, if that matters. Likewise you >>>> can't get the handler from the proxy. >>> If you handlers are frozen, there should be no leaking, shouldn't there? (I >>> actually think that freezing the handler should be done in the no-op >>> forwarding proxy example or any handler factory, but that's another issue). >> No default freezing is going to be imposed. :-| > I didn't mean to impose freezing objects, sorry for the > misunderstanding. I was more going for highly encouraging people to do > so by showing it in the no-op forwarding proxy example. > > David _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
