The private names proposal would private another way to avoid creating extension methods with conflicting names http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:private_names
On Mar 18, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Mike Shaver wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:11 PM, John-David Dalton > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Extending the Object.prototype is a compatibility nightmare > > It was a compatibility nightmare when people didn't namespace, and > when you couldn't make non-enumerable properties. Using a namespace > for additions to the prototype chain and using ES5's defineProperty to > keep those additions from affecting enumeration behaviour seems like > it overcomes those, at least to me. > > Mike > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
