On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2011, at 9:31 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Mark Miller alluded to a crypto API task group without Ecma TC39. I'm open >> to it, provided we can include some of the domain experts who have >> participated on this list (but who may not be employed by Ecma members). >> > > "without"? I'm not sure what you mean by this, so I don't know if it's what > I intended to allude to ;). > > > Whoops -- typo'ed "within". Big difference! > > Hope the remaining context pointed to the typo. I wouldn't worry about > non-members attending otherwise. > Good. That's what I intended to allude to. I think a crypto task group could follow the same model that i18n is following -- towards stdization of a document separate from 262 but within tc39. I agree about outside domain experts. In fact, I wish we could invite outside domain experts participate in all tc39 activities as we deem appropriate. I do not understand the rationale for bounding invited expert participation. > > /be > > -- Cheers, --MarkM
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
