On Mar 22, 2011, at 1:28 AM, Kam Kasravi wrote: >> Does this matter? In Java it matters much less because of types. In JS, it >> matters more but an IDE could still help (as in Java, but without types -- >> just lexical use-to-def connection-making by the IDE). > There would be several private names per type though each one preventing any > occurrence of that name within any identifier in any member expression at > that scope.
Unless spelled with brackets and quotes, yes. > This would complicate things like minifiers. It would, but life's rough for minifiers already. I'm not dismissing this but it's not make or break. > Not to mention trying to mix say svg, canvas and Dom within some framework > since they all use common member names such as element, node, children, > attributes, etc. You would not use those names in private declarations. Remember the private declaration is optional. You can always index. /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
