On 3/23/11, Mike Shaver <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Garrett Smith <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> Bad quoting made it confusing, but I was (am) right. Edited as intended
>> below:
>> On 3/23/11, Garrett Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On 3/23/11, Mike Shaver <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Garrett Smith <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> javascript: alert(new InternalError("Got on tha inside, bitch!"));
>>>>>
>>>>> Hrm. seems odd to expose the constructor publicly.
>>>>
>>>> Necessary to permit instanceof testing, no?
>> [...]
>>>>
>>> No; instanceof uses [[HasInstance]] which compares the Function's
>>> prototype property to the each objet in the object's prototype chain.
>>> If there is a match, the result is true. Otherwise, the result is
>>> false.
>
> I mean that you need the constructor exposed to test instanceof for
> InternalError.
>
FOr what?
--
Garrett
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
