On Apr 2, 2011, at 12:16 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: > You must mean only in the cases where typeof a == typeof b, then a == b <=> a > === b, and === is an e.r. But that does not mean == is an e.r.
Forgot typeof a == "object" above, to be precise. > For mismatching types, == is not transitive, so not an e.r. Also, for NaNs it > is not reflexive (neither is ===). The desire for < (partial order) as well as a true e.r. is strong, though, so thanks for raising this issue. The big question remains: Is some modular opt-in to better == (and <) for objects worth the complexity? /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
