On 13.04.2011 12:32, David Bruant wrote:
Le 13/04/2011 10:18, Dmitry A. Soshnikov a écrit :
On 13.04.2011 12:08, David Bruant wrote:
Le 13/04/2011 09:02, Dmitry A. Soshnikov a écrit :
Yes, the pattern is interesting, though, really, which practical
use-case will it have?
I warned from the beginning that I didn't see any :-p
More seriously, the main point of sharing my experiment was the
discussion on shared handlers for several proxies.
(...)
(...)
Regarding shared handlers, if exactly this is the point, we have also
think which practical things can we have.
The straightforward benefit I see for shared handlers is to avoid one
handler instanciation per proxy instanciation.
So only an optimization? I guess there can be other useful things in
shared state per proxies. Though, a shared state by itself isn't
directly related with shared handler (though, and not excludes it).
The downside is the brainfuck it produces in terms of scope definition
and code organisation (I've worked hard to make my code easy to read.
I find it hard nonetheless).
Do you have other practical things in mind?
Nope, not yet.
Dmitry.
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
