Dynamic binding is bad, mmmkay? ;) Seriously, it's not an efficiency thing. Dynamic scope is easy to write but hard to predict. JS is lexically/statically scoped almost everywhere, except for with, eval, and the global object. Strict mode solves with and eval. Harmony solves the global object.
> You said (in the next letter) that it will be a local (like the let- ones) > binding. Seems, it will "break" previous semantics. No, it doesn't. The previous semantics doesn't include local functions. That's a non-standard extension. > Yes, yes, but which decreases elegance of definitions but increases > "intermediate noise" (though, maybe not so noise?). I dare you to call dynamic bindings elegant to *any* of my friends. ;) Dave _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
