> > As a side note, I'd like to say that, in my opinion, Proxy.Handler is a > misleading name. It seems to imply that all handlers must/should/had > better be a forwarding handler. I agree that it is certainly (one of) > the most important use case, nevertheless, it is a restricting view of > proxies which internal state has no reason to be reduced to a unique > object. I would be more in favor of Proxy.ForwardingHandler, even if > it's a bit long, I admit. >
That's how it was called originally. The name is definitely open for discussion. I have to say I never thought the name "Proxy.Handler" would imply that all handlers must be forwarding handlers, but I see your point. Cheers, Tom
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
