On May 16, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Brendan Eich wrote: > Frozen objects are not observably extensible. I argued that we want an > implementation option to put their shallowly-frozen state (values at least) > in read-only memory. I have not seen anything like an argument why this > option should be forbidden.
And (sorry for followup) in particular, there's no argument for frozen objects as weak map keys needing to sprout mutable private-named properties. We have an existence proof to the contrary. /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
