On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Andreas Rossberg <[email protected]> wrote: > But how would such a proposal affect the > Harmony side of things? Is the intention to have it replace a proper > type of private names in Harmony, or merely complement it?
I'm not sure which proposal you're referring to here, but: 1. We certainly intend to only suggest one type of private name for promotion to proposal. Whether that's unique strings or objects isn't yet clear, but it would be very confusing to have *two* versions of private names. 2. Whatever we propose, if it ends up in Harmony, there will be a way for it be accessible from the non-Harmony heap, and therefore the proposal needs to work reasonably in both cases. -- sam th [email protected] _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
