On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Sean Eagan <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, I wasn't aware of that history. > > I'm not suggesting that default handlers or traps even should exist > from an implementation perspective, just that they could be a nice > specification mechanism now that we have proxies. Otherwise we need > to separately maintain pseudocode and ES versions of the derived > traps.
Of course you could go the other way, and remove the default trap implementations. All objects could have the same internal method implementation regardless of whether or not they are a proxy. Within each internal method there could be a check as to whether the object is a proxy (has a [[Handler]]) AND has the trap, if so, it is invoked, otherwise the default pseudocode is performed. Thanks, Sean Eagan _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
