On May 31, 2011, at 10:07 PM, Kam Kasravi wrote:

> Is it a given that the grammar extensions in the various strawmen are all 
> LR(1)? 

See earlier in this thread, where this strawman was mentioned as requiring 
either a cover grammar for ArrowFormalParameters (namely Expression), plus a 
restriction against arrow block body being a 
block-with-labeled-statement-as-first-child -- or else GLR or PEG or something 
that is not going to fly in the spec.

/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to