On Jun 2, 2011, at 10:46 PM, Kyle Simpson wrote: > I propose a /n flag for regular expressions, which would swap the default > capturing/non-capturing behavior between ( ) and (?: ) operators (that is, ( > ) would not capture, and (?: ) would capture).
I like it. No worries about the .NET somewhat different flag. > The /n property would reflect on the RegExp object as `Noncapturing == true`. Lowercase noncapturing, right? /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
