On Jun 3, 2011, at 4:04 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
> On Jun 3, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Waldemar Horwat wrote:
>
>> Don't you also want to allow (either now or in the future) for the shorthand
>> {x, y} to mean {x:x, y:y}? There are also getters, setters, and various
>> other stuff that can be put into object initializers now or in the future,
>> so there are more possibilities than just an identifier followed by a colon.
>
> True, and {x, y} is noted somewhere (or was in a past version) as a problem.
> http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:object_initialiser_shorthand
> did not get promoted yet, and I forgot to keep this pot boiling.
>
> The accessors are not ambiguous, but the proposed !, ~, and # property
> prefixes for writable, enumerable, and configurable false-setting do make
> trouble.
I updated http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:arrow_function_syntax
to restrict lookahead(2) ∉ { Identifier ":", "get" Identifier, "set" Identifier
}] StatementList.
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
