On Jun 15, 2011, at 10:25 PM, Mike Samuel wrote: > 2011/6/15 Brendan Eich <[email protected]>: >> On Jun 15, 2011, at 9:51 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: >> >> My two cents: Ruby (with #{...} in its interpolated quasi-literal strings) >> and other languages allow pretty arbitrary expressions. The lexical issues >> are not insuperable. We are not really playing it "safe" by making narrow >> restrictions (such as Identifier expression only, or dotted identifier >> member expression only), so much as simplifying our spec work. Not even the >> drafting, which IIRC Mike already did. Rather, the validation that we would >> need to do. >> I think we should step up, validate MIke's work, and formalize it fully. I >> thereby summon Waldemar. ;-) > > What can I do to make this easier?
Not clear. Validate that you do not get confused by any } in a quoted context in ES5.1, somehow. Convince Waldemar that your validation is sound. I'll buy you a Vegas vacation (kidding, Google can pay :-P). /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
