On Jun 20, 2011, at 3:43 AM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
> Would it make sense to include a shorthand for calling
> Object.defineProperty() to object literals?
>
> Possible benefits:
> - Extensible, should other property attributes come up in the future
> - Descriptive
> - Might obviate the need to have a shorthand for "enumerable" (I usually
> ignore it and can’t think of any use cases)
>
> === Example ===
>
> var Multiplier = {
> FACTOR :: { value: 3, writable: false },
Do not use :: -- it is wanted for
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:guards (and used previously in
E4X, ECMA-357).
Allen presented new syntax roughly as verbose at the March TC39 meeting.
General reaction was "too verbose".
Wherefore the #!~ prefixes idea, now in
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:object_literals -- the syntax
there is definitely not final, BTW, but something like it is needed. I've
argued we shouldn't try to be "half-verbose", and since ES5 has the very
verbose functional API, object initialisers probably will go the other way.
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
