On Jul 8, 2011, at 3:24 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: > In other words, we don't gain any distinctiveness, or make any particular > claims about private name objects that could not be made about other > (deeply-frozen, generated-only, say by Object.create or Proxy.create in a > distinguished factory function) kinds of objects, via a new typeof-type.
Oh, of course you meant to distinguish private names via typeof precisely to tell that they are not converted to strings when used as property names. For that test, the proposal http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:private_name_objects proposes an isName predicate function exported from the "@name" built-in module. /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
