On Jul 18, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:

> Word on the street, from folks ranging the skill gamut, is that <|, <& and so 
> on are Perl-ish line noise. We should consider alternatives, even if it means 
> restricted productions.

As I've said in the past, I'm generally more in the COBOL/readability camp than 
I am in the APL/terseness  camp (in reality, I more of a PL/I guy.  (and what's 
this new fangled Perl thing that everybody keeps talking about??))

That said, in writing sample code I've come to find <| to be rather pleasant to 
both write and read. 

Beyond that, we need to really decide what we want to surface syntax of JS to 
be like as it evolve.  Do we want a keyword rich language or a concise language 
that uses lots of special characters.  How to we find the balance between the 
extreme.  For now I don't think we really have anything to guide us so we keep 
oscillate  from on to the other based upon the latest feedback on a proposal 
that goes one way or the other.

es-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to