On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Kevin Reid <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 19:57, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > > The good news: the proxy traps as proposed are unchanged. Hats off to Tom > > and Mark for nailing that API and minimizing its parameterization! > > Proxies have two prototype implementations now: Firefox since 4, and now > V8 > > (http://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=8733) -- not sure when that > > shows up under a flag in Chrome canaries, someone from Google will know. > > Just to clarify: “as proposed” = the current version of > <http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:proxies>? That is, > will the proxy parameter remain first, rather than last? > We can certainly continue discussing this. But let's postpone trying to resolve any of this until Tom gets back from vacation. I still suspect there was some crucial point Tom had explained to me that I forgot. > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
