Le 30/08/2011 21:40, Brendan Eich a écrit : > On Aug 30, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Andreas Rossberg wrote: > >> On 30 August 2011 18:41, David Bruant <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> This would facilitate the author work when it comes to creating >> functions that look like functions without having to always >> include some initialization code for .length, .prototype and such. >> It will still be possible to opt-out of .length or .prototype if >> the author doesn't >> >> >> I don't think it's worth introducing special cases in the semantics, >> especially not for something like length. > > Perhaps, but I think David has a stronger case for opting out of > .prototype. Actually that's what current function proxies do by default (no .prototype unless otherwise specified). My suggestion is to put a .prototype by default with keeping the option to opt-out (same with .length, etc.)
> Indeed self-hosting some of the ES1-5 builtins requires doing so, somehow. Couldn't it be achived with bound functions (which do not have an own "prototype" property)? David
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
