On Sep 12, 2011, at 12:22 PM, John J Barton wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:00 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Some of the discussion on this thread amounts to "IDEs work great for > typed languages so let's make JS typed". What if we started with > "What would be great for JavaScript developers"? Then we would not > waste a lot of time talking about static analysis. It's the wrong > tool.
Why are you assuming that conclusion already? Why not answer your own question "What would be great for JavaScript developers?" and if the answer includes type inference, great? /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
