Without private members, do we still need the keyword "public" in class
literals?
For example, instead of
constructor(geometry, materials) {
super(geometry, materials);
public identityMatrix = new THREE.Matrix4();
public bones = [];
public boneMatrices = [];
...
}
I find the following just as intuitive, without the need for the keyword
"public":
constructor(geometry, materials) {
super(geometry, materials);
this.identityMatrix = new THREE.Matrix4();
this.bones = [];
this.boneMatrices = [];
...
}
Similarly intuitive is something that I’ve seen somewhere – passing through
constructor arguments as members.
class Point {
constructor(this.x, this.y) {
}
}
I don’t think "public" helps, I think it makes things *less* intuitive.
--
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
[email protected]
twitter.com/rauschma
home: rauschma.de
blog: 2ality.com
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
