On Oct 1, 2011, at 2:07 AM, Brendan Eich wrote: > On Oct 1, 2011, at 1:57 AM, Waldemar Horwat wrote: > >> On 09/30/2011 04:37 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: >>> since we haven't come up with a way to do 2 and 5 that works, >> >> That's what makes this into a dead end. Worse, by claiming the class >> syntax you'd be precluding finding a different way that works in the future. > > That does not follow. Item 2 is guaranteed shape,
Also, const class can be supported now by the desugaring I gave, and it does guarantee the shape of the sealed instances. /be > item 5 is const instance variable. We can add these later, restricting the > syntax for now to exclude anything like 'const' instance variable > declarations. This does not preclude adding such extensions later. > > /be > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
