Regards -- Irakli Gozalishvili Web: http://www.jeditoolkit.com/ Address: 29 Rue Saint-Georges, 75009 Paris, France (http://goo.gl/maps/3CHu) On Monday, 2011-10-17 at 11:16 , Jake Verbaten wrote: > I do the same with > Object.prototype.new = function () { > var o = Object.create(this); > o.constructor && o.constructor.apply(o, arguments); > return o; > } > However rather then calling proto.new(); I would like var o = new proto(); > > May I ask why (less syntax in language is better no) ? > and o instanceof proto to work > > You have proto.isPrototypeOf(o) instead. > > > On Oct 17, 2011 9:17 AM, "Irakli Gozalishvili" <[email protected] > > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > > > I think we should just forget about new keyword, prototype property all > > togather and move towards something more simple: > > var proto = { method: function() { }, > > new: function() { > > var self = Object.create(this); > > this.initialize.apply(self, arguments); > > return self; > > }, > > initialize: function(someValue) { > > this.things = someValue > > } > > } > > > > var o = proto.new(someValue); > > > > Of course with a help of library that would not require as much > > boilerplate: https://github.com/Gozala/selfish > > > > > > Regards > > -- > > Irakli Gozalishvili > > Web: http://www.jeditoolkit.com/ > > Address: 29 Rue Saint-Georges, 75009 Paris, France (http://goo.gl/maps/3CHu) > > > > On Tuesday, 2011-10-11 at 20:53 , Jake Verbaten wrote: > > > > > is there any kind of proposal for syntax that is like : > > var proto > > > > > = { > method: function(... > > > _______________________________________________ > > > es-discuss mailing list > > > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > > > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
