On Oct 27, 2011, at 12:04 AM, Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
> point 1 is utopia since ...varname breaks syntax in any case
No, you missed the point. this need to be valid "Harmony code" in order to
avoid a migration tax:
function f() {
return g.apply(undefined,arguments);
}
no ... or any other new syntax is involved.
>
> second point would be easier like this ?
>
> function (arg1obj={a,b,c}, p=[x,y]) {
>
> }
>
yes, but that is ambiguous with the parameter default value syntax. If anybody
wants a change in the agreed upon parameter syntax extensions they need to make
a viable proposal.
Allen
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
