On Oct 30, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
>> Over the last couple years we have explored a lot of variations of how to
>> approach this problem. Most of them are captured on the wiki:
>>
>> http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:obj_initialiser_constructors
>> http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:obj_initialiser_class_abstraction&rev=1299955398
>>
>> http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:obj_initialiser_class_abstraction
>>
>>
>> (and other intermediate versions of these and other pages)
>
> Thanks. Note that my idea is more about defining a callable object using
> object literal syntax.
I know...we experimented with that too. It's hard to find a syntax that isn't
acquired in one way or another. Also, there have been concerns expressed about
muddling function body and object literal syntax.
Allen
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
