2011/11/2 Quildreen Motta <[email protected]>: >> I don't think hard coding the name of the super-constructor is a >> problem. > > It is when you take into account that functions in JavaScript are not bound > to an object, they are generic. You can simply assign any function to any > object and it'll most likely just work.
I think the chances are slim that you can take a function that does a super call, put it on a different object, and it will 'just work'. It's a pretty rare case. <troll> C++ requires you to state the name of the super-class in super calls, and Java doesn't. Do we want to be like Java? </troll> -- Erik Corry _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
