No, not at all. It's a conscious design decision that results in only introducing one new property to the global object (two if you count the shorthand reference to $)
Rick On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Axel Rauschmayer <[email protected]> wrote: > But isn’t jQuery.bar() just a work-around, because JavaScript does not > have modules, yet? > > On Oct 30, 2011, at 21:05 , Rick Waldron wrote: > > This pattern makes is _very_ easy for newer developers/adopters to > understand the division of functionality: > > - DOM methods here: jQuery().foo() > - Everything else here: jQuery.bar() > > > -- > Dr. Axel Rauschmayer > [email protected] > > home: rauschma.de > twitter: twitter.com/rauschma > blog: 2ality.com > > > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
