>> If I wanted to ignore the length property, I would use:
>> let { 0: a, 1: b } = someValue
>>
>
> This is pretty much my thinking too. A programmer's choice to use [ ]
> instead of {} the destructuring pattern means something. By choosing to use [
> ] as the pattern they are expressing the intent to view someValue using
> "array element" access semantics. If they don't care about such things, they
> can use the { } pattern.
One would have to rethink all of these issues if the namespaces of array
indices and of property names became disjoint in the future. But it’s just an
edge case, anyway.
--
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
[email protected]
home: rauschma.de
twitter: twitter.com/rauschma
blog: 2ality.com
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
